🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.